-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Support for MIPS64el architecture #23
Comments
Docker support on mips64le: the docker-ce version 20.10.0 on the milestone. |
Could I build a docker-ce version 19.03 on mips64le with a forked repository? Once docker-ce community support mips64le, we can move to docker-ce 20.10.0. |
Is there any commit that refer to port ARM64 or AMD64 on BurmillaOS ? So that I can port mips64le on BurmillaOS quickly. |
Looks that we mights end up to sharing Docker binaries between system and user Docker #39 so we need similar static binaries like on https://download.docker.com/linux/static/stable/x86_64/ |
Closing as no one is working on with this. |
I noticed that someone was asking about how to port RancherOS to MIPS64el on rancher#3027 and out of curiosity I did investigate it a bit and added initial configs for it to os-base, os-initrd-base and os-kernel when I was working on those and tried to get new buildroot version working (that is not ready like you can see from #12).
However, now it looks to be we might have potential #2 (comment) maintainer for this use case so we can consider finalize that work.
High level TODO list:
It is also worth to mention that Debian supports that architecture and here is some info from them https://www.debian.org/ports/mips/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: