-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extended matches shouldn't be displayed as the main title of the work matches #393
Comments
oh, note that the same bug appears on the Versions results too |
I've added but are sure what you're reporting is a bug? there also seems to have duplicate catalogInfo in query for versions: resulting in duplicate display: (but I guess I'll have to handle these client-side) |
Ah thanks! I'll have a look at the duplicates in catalogInfo tomorrow. Matches in altLabels are interesting... Do we have another place to display them? maybe a Other title? The ideal would be to always display the prefLabel as the main label for the item (not the altLabel, even when there's a match)... would that be complex to implement? |
Ah, well, actually the duplicate catalogInfo (one with highlight, one without) should be handled on the client indeed, like the prefLabel |
actually never mind: buda-base/xmltoldmigration#156 |
duplicates have disappeared! also, related: buda-base/lds-queries#61 |
well done, thanks! |
hmmm... it's more or less intended as it's a field that comes from the work and the search actually doesn't search on this field (it's a coincidence that there's a match here)... so, maybe let's not do that, at least not now |
ah no never mind, if it's already in place let's keep it! |
|
great, thanks a lot! |
just fixed missing highlighting here: http://library-dev.bdrc.io/search?q=%22Mar%20me%20smon%20lam%22~1&lg=bo-x-ewts&t=Instance not using matching |
For instance in https://library.bdrc.io/search?q=%22performance%22&lg=en&t=Work i've just added the extended matches, and most of them are in the
catalogInfo
field but they appear as the main labelThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: