Follow up of #2400 - Shields settings is lost after clearing data and relaunching

[GeetaSarvadnya]

Description

Found while testing #2400

Follow up of #2400 - Shields settings is lost after clearing data and relaunching

Steps to Reproduce

1. Visit brave.com and disable shields
2. Visit github.com and change site shields settings from default to custom
3. Clear browsing data from all time and select all checkboxes
4. Restart browser after data is cleared
5. Open brave.com, shields is auto-enabled
6. Open github.com, site shields settings are lost and reverted back to default settings

Actual result:

Shields settings is lost after clearing data and relaunching

Expected result:

Clear data shouldn't reset shields settings

Reproduces how often:

Easy

Brave version (brave://version info)

Brave	1.7.67 Chromium: 80.0.3987.149 (Official Build) beta (64-bit)
Revision	5f4eb224680e5d7dca88504586e9fd951840cac6-refs/branch-heads/3987_137@{#16}
OS	Windows 10 OS Version 1803 (Build 17134.1006)

Version/Channel Information:

• Can you reproduce this issue with the current release? Yes
• Can you reproduce this issue with the beta channel? Yes
• Can you reproduce this issue with the dev channel? Yes
• Can you reproduce this issue with the nightly channel? Yes

Other Additional Information:

• Does the issue resolve itself when disabling Brave Shields? NA
• Does the issue resolve itself when disabling Brave Rewards? NA
• Is the issue reproducible on the latest version of Chrome? NA

Miscellaneous Information:

cc: @brave/legacy_qa @simonhong @tomlowenthal @diracdeltas @bbondy

[btlechowski]

Test plan from original fix(brave/brave-core#4361) mentions a new setting in Clear browsing data. It is missing.

Brave	1.7.70 Chromium: 80.0.3987.149 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)
Revision	5f4eb224680e5d7dca88504586e9fd951840cac6-refs/branch-heads/3987_137@{#16}
OS	Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

[ze0ss]

is it fixed now?
did u commit?

[bridiver]

This is the correct behavior and is a duplicate of #2400

[ze0ss]

@bridiver it clearly said "follow up"

[GeetaSarvadnya]

as per the comments #2400 (comment) - Issue is invalid marking it as invalid