Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Premium users should have a larger context limit #33880

Open
Tracked by #35733
mattmcalister opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Tracked by #35733

Premium users should have a larger context limit #33880

mattmcalister opened this issue Oct 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mattmcalister
Copy link

consider increasing limit from 2k to 4k

@mattmcalister mattmcalister converted this from a draft issue Oct 24, 2023
@bbondy bbondy moved this from Todo to Important / Polish in Browser AI Oct 26, 2023
@petemill
Copy link
Member

The context limit is determined by the model. If a user is premium, then they can use a model with a higher limit, like Claude Instant

@mattmcalister
Copy link
Author

Claude should be able to support articles like this (7k words), but i'm getting the This conversation is too long error

Image

@petemill
Copy link
Member

petemill commented Nov 1, 2023

If you're seeing that error then that means that the actual claude API is giving the error. We could truncate this article by lowering our page length character estimate. It must be set too high.

@mattmcalister mattmcalister added the priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release. label Jan 31, 2024
@mattmcalister mattmcalister moved this from Important / Polish to In Progress in Browser AI Apr 10, 2024
@mattmcalister mattmcalister added priority/P3 The next thing for us to work on. It'll ride the trains. and removed priority/P2 A bad problem. We might uplift this to the next planned release. labels Jun 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants