-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Fix shared links previewed in other subdomains #173
Conversation
let src = `${appHost}/integrations/officeonline/openExcelOnlinePreviewer`; | ||
let runmodeSrc = '/integrations/officeonline/openExcelOnlinePreviewer'; | ||
|
||
const domain = document.createElement('a'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just checking - will this cause issues on IE like that bug you found a few weeks ago?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch. Is there a reason why we created an tag an didn't just use window.location to begin with?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Creating a tag lets us leverage the browser when parsing out different parts of the domain
@@ -184,25 +184,28 @@ const MESSAGE_HOST_READY = 'Host_PostmessageReady'; | |||
*/ | |||
setupRunmodeURL(appHost, fileId, sharedLink) { | |||
// @TODO(jpress): Combine with setupWopiSrc Logic when removing the platform fork | |||
let src = `${appHost}/integrations/officeonline/openExcelOnlinePreviewer`; | |||
let runmodeSrc = '/integrations/officeonline/openExcelOnlinePreviewer'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"route" might be a better name for this, just because a runmode isn't actually included in the src URL we build
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed - we also shouldn't have Box-specific language in our code if possible.
); | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
describe('setupWOPISrc()', () => { | ||
it('should append the file ID if there is no shared link', () => { | ||
const src = office.setupWOPISrc(office.options.apiHost, office.options.file.id, office.options.sharedLink); | ||
expect(src).to.equal('app.box.com/wopi/files/123'); | ||
expect(src).to.equal('https://app.box.com/wopi/files/123'); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('should append the shared name and file ID if there is a shared link', () => { | ||
office.options.sharedLink = 'https://app.box.com/s/abcd'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a few tests for when the appHost name and the shared domain don't match? i.e. appHost = "app" and shared domain = "cloud", appHost = "ibm" and shared domain = "cloud", appHost = "cloud" and shared domain = "app"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will do!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
No description provided.