Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(build): Add dry run option #1116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2019
Merged

chore(build): Add dry run option #1116

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2019

Conversation

mickr
Copy link
Contributor

@mickr mickr commented Dec 13, 2019

Adding dry_run option to release script for easier testing.

@mickr mickr requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2019 00:13
@boxcla
Copy link

boxcla commented Dec 13, 2019

Verified that @mickr has signed the CLA. Thanks for the pull request!

jstoffan
jstoffan previously approved these changes Dec 13, 2019
@@ -6,6 +6,19 @@ export NODE_PATH=$NODE_PATH:./node_modules
OLD_VERSION="XXX"
VERSION="XXX"

dry_run=false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like our current variables follow SNAKE_CAPS convention.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of the variables do, our switches do not. Since this was a command line switch I made it look like the others

@jstoffan
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the scope should probably be chore rather than feat for this commit, since the change doesn't affect the end user.

@jstoffan jstoffan changed the title feat(build): Add dry run option chore(build): Add dry run option Dec 13, 2019
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3c14e52 into box:master Dec 13, 2019
@mickr mickr deleted the optimize-build branch January 6, 2020 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants