Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generate_presigned_url documentation #3048

Closed
andrebianchessi opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

generate_presigned_url documentation #3048

andrebianchessi opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
closed-for-staleness documentation This is a problem with documentation.

Comments

@andrebianchessi
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The documentation for the generate_presigned_url method lists ClientMethod (string) as a parameters, but doesn't explain which strings are acceptable.

Describe the solution you'd like
The documentation should list all possible ClientMethod values ('get_object', for example).

@andrebianchessi andrebianchessi added feature-request This issue requests a feature. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Oct 19, 2021
@stobrien89 stobrien89 removed the needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. label Oct 20, 2021
@stobrien89
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @andrebianchessi,

Thanks for reaching out! The generate_presigned_url documentation could definitely use some improvement— we're actually tracking a separate issue internally regarding the auto-generation of the method and documentation for services that don't support presigned urls.

For us, updating the boto3 reference for generate_presigned_url is a bit more complicated than other reference guide updates just due to how our docs are built and sourced, but this is definitely a reasonable request and likely something we'll do once we correct the issue I mentioned above.

@stobrien89 stobrien89 added documentation This is a problem with documentation. and removed feature-request This issue requests a feature. labels Oct 20, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

Greetings! It looks like this issue hasn’t been active in longer than one year. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release. In the absence of more information, we will be closing this issue soon. If you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or upvote with a reaction on the initial post to prevent automatic closure. If the issue is already closed, please feel free to open a new one.

@github-actions github-actions bot added closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. closed-for-staleness and removed closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. labels Oct 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-for-staleness documentation This is a problem with documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants