-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trimming amplicon primers? #21
Comments
Hi, There is two ways you may approach this task:
The other options are up to you, but standard parameters should do the trick in most case. I would suggest a "guess-only" (-go) run before proceeding for quality control and sanity check. It is a lot faster than a full trimming run and will only display potential adapters found in the dataset. |
Hey, thanks for the quick answer. So I used 16s rRNA primers and they have degenerate bases, like this Do you think Porechop_abi is able to handle that if I use that as custom adapters, or should i rather write out all versions of the primers. |
As far as I know, IUPAC sequences are not supported by Porechop's trimming algorithm, which is the one we use. I do not have experience with degenerate bases on ONT sequencer, but I think it may be useful to perform a "--guess-only" run anyway. If the sequencer has any kind of bias, or maybe acts strange on such bases, the ABI algorithm will build several consensus sequence that should match the forms that are actually present in your dataset. |
Okay, thanks for the feedback. That is really helpful. I will try it out my dataset. |
Hi,
I am trying to find a tool that can process nanopore data and identify and trim my PCR primers in the dataset?
How would I do that with porechop_abi? is that possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: