You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Databroker.v0 and this suitcase now have conflicting indexes due to this PR: #34
Where we decided to make resource uid unique. (Databroker.v0 also has code in it to create indexes.) This causes an exception when the index is created, if a conflicting index already exists. Which means that you can use this suitcase and databroker.v0 on the same database until it is fixed.
@jklynch and I think that we should make index creation independent of suitcase and databroker. @danielballan suggested that we make the index creation independant, but we leave it in this package, and don't call it in the suitcase.init
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@gwbischof summarized my view accurately above; to add a detail, tools like databroker-unpack will need access to this so they can seamlessly create/configure new databases, so it needs to stay in an importable package (as a opposed to be encoded in ansible).
A big +1 for separating this administrative activity from the reading and writing tools.
Databroker.v0 and this suitcase now have conflicting indexes due to this PR: #34
Where we decided to make resource uid unique. (Databroker.v0 also has code in it to create indexes.) This causes an exception when the index is created, if a conflicting index already exists. Which means that you can use this suitcase and databroker.v0 on the same database until it is fixed.
@jklynch and I think that we should make index creation independent of suitcase and databroker.
@danielballan suggested that we make the index creation independant, but we leave it in this package, and don't call it in the suitcase.init
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: