You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should support bed, gtf, gff3 and other bioinformatics formats (we already support fastq). We are already past the point of being bindings for htslib. This also aligns well with #55. Conversion from bed coordinates to sam or vcf coordinates should be supported directly. Potentially also supporting PAF?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pretty simple. We should conform with bed format, at least the 12 columns that UCSC and Ensemble agree on. Or we could build as we go kinda similar to the way gff3d does. Get fields if they exist. Other than that use a BGZFile for reading (gets us bgzf, gzip, and network support) and parse each line into a set of our coordinate system. Other fields are optional. Bedgraph could be another format to support. Though we could go crazy trying to support all the formats.
I think we should support bed, gtf, gff3 and other bioinformatics formats (we already support fastq). We are already past the point of being bindings for htslib. This also aligns well with #55. Conversion from bed coordinates to sam or vcf coordinates should be supported directly. Potentially also supporting PAF?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: