You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The only other system that I'm aware of is https://github.com/Sean-Blank/AMRcoref as described in the paper "End-to-End AMR Coreference Resolution". The scores in the paper are relatively similar to this project's scores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Re Fu et al. and Li et al work: the scores you mention are the scores they report in their work. However, I have tried to reproduce their work and failed. I contacted both authors, and while I had more exchange with Li, they both stopped responding to my correspondence.
This is very unfortunate given Fu et al. reports a F1 ave from 34 to 62.4 (28.4 improvement over the baseline) and Li et al. reports a F1ave from 62.4 to 73.5 (11.1 improvement over the baseline), which is now the new baseline.
For all practical purposes, amr_coref is the SOTA for others using AMR coref in their own research.
The only other system that I'm aware of is https://github.com/Sean-Blank/AMRcoref as described in the paper "End-to-End AMR Coreference Resolution". The scores in the paper are relatively similar to this project's scores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: