Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Budget #200

Closed
wiz opened this issue Mar 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Support Budget #200

wiz opened this issue Mar 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
a:proposal https://bisq.wiki/Proposals was:approved
Milestone

Comments

@wiz
Copy link

wiz commented Mar 21, 2020

This is a Bisq Network proposal. Please familiarize yourself with the submission and review process.

@bisq-network/support
@bisq-network/support-agents
@bisq-network/l1-support-agents
@bisq-network/refund-agents
@bisq-network/intern-support-agents

I propose to fix the compensation for Support team members as follows

refund agent: 1000 USD
burning man: 250 USD
mediators: 1000 USD
support agents: 500 USD
support interns: 0 USD

The previous per-case compensation disincentivizes support team members from reporting/fixing bugs because it would reduce their salary, but flat-rate compensation incentivizes support team members to report/fix bugs to get their case load down. We should always try to make incentives in Bisq align properly as much as possible.

@burningman2
Copy link

@wiz
My compensation requests are usually 200 USD.
bisq-network/compensation#535 (comment)

@wiz
Copy link
Author

wiz commented Apr 14, 2020

It's just the budget, of course you can request lower if you want. Thanks burning man!

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Apr 14, 2020

@wiz, it looks like we've already got pretty good consensus to approve this, but it might be worth submitting it as a DAO proposal just to make it official and to make sure everybody got their eyes on it. Do you plan to do that?

@cbeams cbeams added this to the Cycle 12 milestone Apr 14, 2020
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Apr 14, 2020

Also, I'd say let's lower the burning man budget down to $250 based on @burningman2's comments. No need to have this extra float in the budget if it's not going to get claimed. It might find better uses. Plus, we all need to think about ways to trim the budget after the April security incident.

@wiz
Copy link
Author

wiz commented Jun 13, 2020

@cbeams I made the edit you requested, and since since there was no objections I think we can consider this proposal as accepted. In any case, once we get a Support Team Lead, they will be in charge of the budget, so this was only a temporary thing for the cycles where we had no Support Team Lead.

@wiz wiz closed this as completed Jun 13, 2020
@cbeams cbeams added a:proposal https://bisq.wiki/Proposals was:approved labels Jun 18, 2020
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Jun 18, 2020

I've added the was:approved label. Again, we need a Proposals Maintainer to do this stuff in a systematic way; see bisq-network/roles#30 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a:proposal https://bisq.wiki/Proposals was:approved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants