Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 7 #400

Closed
devinbileck opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

For Cycle 7 #400

devinbileck opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@devinbileck
Copy link
Member

devinbileck commented Nov 11, 2019

Summary

This compensation request covers work delivered since the previous voting period (for cycle 6) up until just prior to the end of the cycle 7 proposal phase, between 2019-10-10 and 2019-11-10.

As we are now using the 90 days average BSQ price for compensation requests, as per accepted proposal 114, and as stated in compensation 385, the BSQ rate for cycle 7 is 0.79 USD per 1 BSQ.

  • BSQ requested: ‭3227.84
  • DAO proposal transaction ID: 43c0ac4369640f4e0f8b797a02c06ea79665b5fb5bc003334a7d9425d054b683

Contributions delivered

Contributions in progress

I have a couple open PR's that are still in progress:

I am in the process of setting up a tx tracking service on my BTC node using https://github.com/Blockstream/electrs.

I have starting looking into deploying some tor relays.

Roles performed

Note: I am requesting a higher amount for each node which have additional requirements (e.g. storage, CPU, RAM).

Notes to self

Details
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@devinbileck I think it is better to value the positions in BSQ instead of USD and convert it afterwards as it makes it harder to compare with all the other compensation requests.

@devinbileck
Copy link
Member Author

I have converted the amounts to BSQ.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Nov 24, 2019

Closed as accepted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants