Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BTC Sellers Stop Answering #4126

Closed
leo816 opened this issue Apr 7, 2020 · 13 comments
Closed

BTC Sellers Stop Answering #4126

leo816 opened this issue Apr 7, 2020 · 13 comments

Comments

@leo816
Copy link

leo816 commented Apr 7, 2020

Description

Bisq's biggest problem regarding user-experience is that if the btc seller stops answering (or doesn't confirm he received the funds) the btc buyer won't get his funds back for 20 DAYS In some cases, traders are leaving Bisq for this reason. A user that does everything correctly cannot be penalized this much time even if he Is awarded the other party's deposit. This really needs to be addressed, please comment ideas on how this could be solved. this is high priority.

Version

Steps to reproduce

Expected behaviour

Actual behaviour

Screenshots

Device or machine

Additional info

@leo816 leo816 changed the title Sellers Stop Answering BTC Sellers Stop Answering Apr 7, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Apr 7, 2020

I've been thinking about this lately, and I think this 2 measures would improve the situation:

  • Reduce by half the time allowed for mediation and arbitration (5 days for altcoin mediation is more than ennough), and it would be strange that fiat requires more than 10 days to solve a dispute.
  • We are calling refund agent to a role that still is operating as an arbitrator, a second order investigator and final judge. Refund agent should be just that, an agent which main purpose is to perform dispute payouts. Refund agent should not need to request any more info than what mediators already suggest, and add an extra charge to disappeared trader for not accepting mediator's suggestion. That would encourage the settlement by trading peers while still reduce the impact on diligent traders.
    After mediation, I had to wait 5 days to be refunded because the arbitrator needed to know what the other part had to say. The other part already had 10 days to show up, but he did not. Mediator and refund agent should share information to speed up the dispute process.

@leo816
Copy link
Author

leo816 commented Apr 10, 2020

Reduce by half the time allowed for mediation and arbitration

I agree with that. I think the fact that users that use the platform correctly have to go through this long process and keep presenting their case, while the other party received their payment on time and never responded, makes no sense. I suggested that the refund agent should get an automatic summary report by the mediator on every case he gets. This hurts the user-experience significantly.

and add an extra charge to disappeared trader for not accepting mediator's suggestion

besides cutting down the waiting time for the party who made the payment on time, it seems that this solution still treats the same the person who never showed up and caused all the trouble for the other. Unless you are suggesting that the extra charge is made as well as the deposit from the other party as penalty.

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Apr 10, 2020

besides cutting down the waiting time for the party who made the payment on time, it seems that this solution still treats the same the person who never showed up and caused all the trouble for the other. Unless you are suggesting that the extra charge is made as well as the deposit from the other party as penalty.

Of course, penalty should be applied to offender to reward offended party. On the case I had, refund agent decided to still leave some of the deposit to the offender, and it was a future trade.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 19, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the was:dropped label Jul 19, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 26, 2020

This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. Feel free to reopen it if you think it is still relevant.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 26, 2020
@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

Still relevant.

@ripcurlx ripcurlx reopened this Jul 27, 2020
@chimp1984
Copy link
Contributor

We could consider to block onion addresses of users who do not respond as well as flagging his signed witness. Problem would be if the reason are caused due a bug or network issues. But I guess those are very few. For altcoins onion blocking will have limited effect as user can create new one. For fiat banning the signed witness has more effect. Of course it introduce more centralization from mediation side as well for the filter feature.

Lets see first how the increased security deposit will help...

@chimp1984
Copy link
Contributor

chimp1984 commented Jul 27, 2020

Automated altcoon confirmation like for XMR (#4378) would help as well for those cases where the user was just lazy. Of course his app need to be online.

@chimp1984
Copy link
Contributor

Another idea: bisq-network/proposals#241

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 25, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 16, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the was:dropped label Apr 16, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 28, 2022

This issue has been automatically closed because of inactivity. Feel free to reopen it if you think it is still relevant.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants