You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here's a brain teaser that I am struggling to explain at the moment. I need to review it tomorrow with a fresh mind, but creating an issue so as not to lose track of it (and maybe get another mind to review it).
I was testing a scenario where I had submitted a compensation request for 100 BSQ and had just enough BSQ to cover the fees, but not enough to vote (where I found #2622).
Here is the sequence of events (starting from a balance of 0 BSQ):
Receive 10 BSQ
Submit compensation request for 100 BSQ, minus 2 BSQ for fee
[balance of 8 BSQ]
Send remaining 8 BSQ
[balance of 0 BSQ]
Compensation request approved, BSQ issued
[at this point I would expect to have a balance of 98 BSQ, but the wallet balance indicates 100]
Adding up the amounts shown below (10+98-8) gives us 100. But calculating it based on the sequence of events (10-2-8+98), gives us 98.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When making the compensation request you burn 2 BSQ as fee and issue 100 BSQ. I think the transaction list aggregates that to 98 BSQ. The sum makes sense, you have 10, burn 2, send 8 elsewhere, issue 100, ie 10 - 2 - 8 + 100 = 100.
Here's a brain teaser that I am struggling to explain at the moment. I need to review it tomorrow with a fresh mind, but creating an issue so as not to lose track of it (and maybe get another mind to review it).
I was testing a scenario where I had submitted a compensation request for 100 BSQ and had just enough BSQ to cover the fees, but not enough to vote (where I found #2622).
Here is the sequence of events (starting from a balance of 0 BSQ):
[balance of 8 BSQ]
[balance of 0 BSQ]
[at this point I would expect to have a balance of 98 BSQ, but the wallet balance indicates 100]
Adding up the amounts shown below (10+98-8) gives us 100. But calculating it based on the sequence of events (10-2-8+98), gives us 98.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: