-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add "Cash in person" as a payment option #1110
Comments
@mutagenfork Thanks for in-person writeup. Is it accurate to say that you envision no arbitration role or responsibility for bisq? But rather only to play match-maker for the exchange... whereas the cash-by-mail writeup does suggest arbitration via review of video evidence.... |
In general, I think the arbiter would find it difficult to decide who was right in a dispute about an in-person cash trade, unless the entire transaction were filmed. For example, if the seller simply grabbed the buyer's cash and ran, the buyer could complain to the arbiter. If there were video footage of the theft, the arbiter could review the tape, and decide for the buyer. |
I do think using bisq to record the outcome of the transaction is useful though. A record of completed transactions would help foster trust. |
The participants to a trade who end up in a dispute ought to be responsible to provide the arbiter with evidence supporting their claim. Arbiters ought to be able to specify deadlines and such. The victim of any disputed in-person trade can collect statements from individuals present (strangers even) and (if such witnesses are willing) collect info about who they are and why they were there so that a comprehensive picture of what happened can be pieced together. If a scammer ever successfully navigates this to the point where the arbiter makes the wrong decision, the victim will have a fantastic story to tell, depending on the amount of evidence collected. Further, it makes sense that even after an arbiter has decided, the case can stay open so that either party can provide more evidence (digging themselves deeper or redeeming themselves as the case may be). I like to think (and really believe that technology makes this so) that the truth eventually comes out as long as people keep looking. |
Parties could exchange printed signatures confirming that they have received stuff from the other side. |
Closing as complete as F2F is now already available on Bisq. |
See #1101 for the rationale for this feature request.
Per @dan-da 's request, here's a proposed protocol for doing "Cash in person" with the bisq network.
Find a meeting place:
Meet in a public place. Scammers and muggers are a lot less likely to try anything with witnesses around. An ideal location will meet the following criteria:
Some examples of places that meet these criteria:
A location with security cameras adds an extra layer of security to a trade. If the other party does try to rob you, you'll have physical evidence in a recording that can help the authorities track the offender.
Muggers are also a lot less likely to rob you if there's a guard with a gun a few yards away. Consider bringing along a second person as an additional source of additional security and protection.
Arrange the transaction:
Items to bring:
Before going to the meeting place:
At the meeting place:
When the buyer arrives:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: