Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check if US ACH is really chargeback risky #1052

Closed
ManfredKarrer opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

Check if US ACH is really chargeback risky #1052

ManfredKarrer opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 9 comments

Comments

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor

Gather clear information about the chargeback risks of ACH payment in the US. We have it deactivated because we considered the chargeback risk too high.

@pranay01
Copy link

Would like to explore this. Do I need to get it assigned to me before working on it? Also, what is the nature of output expected - just a report based on research?

@mrosseel
Copy link
Contributor

assigning is not needed, just indicate on this ticket you will be working on it and when you think you can finish it. A report based on research is indeed the expected output.

If you're unsure feel free to ask further questions on this ticket or in slack!

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Jan 12, 2018

Would like to explore this.

Great!

Do I need to get it assigned to me before working on it?

No, but I've just invited you to join the @bisq-network org and can assign it to you if and when you accept.

Also, what is the nature of output expected - just a report based on research?

Yes, a write up on your findings is good for a start, and you can submit that as a comment here, or write it up in a Gist or other doc that you link to from here.

Of particular interest in that report would be research into LocalBitcoins' support for ACH/WIRE and what kind of issues users there have run into.

/cc @flix1

@pranay01
Copy link

Ok. @cbeams Have joined @bisq-network
I will be working on it and plan to finish it within a week.

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Jan 15, 2018

Great, @pranay01. I've assigned you to this issue. Looking forward to your findings!

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pranay01 Did you find out something?

@flix1 Do you know about the risk of ACH or if there is a way to avoid that ACH can be used for a local bank transfer in the US, thus forcing a WIRE transfer which seems to have less chargeback risk.

@pranay01
Copy link

pranay01 commented Feb 19, 2018

@ManfredKarrer Added my research on ACH chargeback risk
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vf7vhZbIOTgFHkJk0zRlv0_55nbOWTufNTIRnoaN-cI/edit?usp=sharing

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great thanks! Can you compare it to Zelle or Quickpay regarding chargeback risk?

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cbeams @flix1
Could you have a look to that screen if the data fields are correct?
We have the requirement that the routing nr has 9 numbers and the account number 4-17 numbers.
Account types are checking and savings.

screen shot 2018-02-22 at 20 00 18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants