You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a reason for using 'peer profile' on the MuSig protocol. My initial thoughts is it is unnecessary as the security is provided by the security deposit and it's inclusion can cause confusion and might lead to some privacy loss from the associated BSQ burns/bond/account age etc on the peers profile.
It is not yet decided if we can use the signed account system from Bisq1. If not we need an alternative for its purpose. The existing reputation system could be that solution. But its an area of open discussion.
These are the first wireframes for the MuSig Offerbook page.
Page view with the market offer distribution (by default)
Page view with the price graphic
Page view with only the offer table
This will be followed with the filter menus content, the create offer wizard and the trade process flow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: