Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add gfainject #51287

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

add gfainject #51287

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

AndreaGuarracino
Copy link
Contributor

This is a pangenome tool to inject mappings/alignments (in BAM and PAF formats) into pangenome graphs (in GFA format).

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces two significant components for the gfainject package. First, a new shell script named build.sh is added in the recipes/gfainject directory. This script automates the build process for a statically linked binary using Rust, including error handling and debugging features. It sets the RUST_BACKTRACE environment variable to provide detailed error information and utilizes the cargo tool to install the package into a specified root directory, defined by the PREFIX environment variable, with verbose output enabled.

Second, a new metadata file, meta.yaml, is introduced, which defines essential information about the gfainject package, including its name, version, source code URL, and SHA256 checksum for integrity verification. The file also outlines build requirements, a test command for verifying installation, and additional metadata such as the package's homepage, license, and supported platforms. These changes establish a foundational structure for the gfainject package in the repository.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add recipe for rukki v0.3.0 #51115: The build.sh script in the rukki PR is similar to the one introduced in the main PR, as both automate the build process for statically linked binaries using Rust and set the RUST_BACKTRACE environment variable for debugging.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f4866f and 8dcd6ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
recipes/gfainject/build.sh (2)

6-6: Consider exporting RUST_BACKTRACE for the build process

Setting RUST_BACKTRACE=1 is beneficial for debugging Rust programs, as it provides detailed backtraces when errors occur. However, to ensure this setting affects the Rust compilation process in the cargo install command, you should export this variable.

Consider modifying the line as follows:

-RUST_BACKTRACE=1
+export RUST_BACKTRACE=1

This change will make the backtrace setting available to the Rust compiler and any Rust programs run during the build process.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck

[warning] 6-6: RUST_BACKTRACE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

(SC2034)


7-7: Appropriate cargo install command with a suggestion

The cargo install command is well-structured:

  • --verbose flag ensures detailed output, which is helpful for debugging.
  • --path . correctly specifies the current directory as the package source.
  • --root ${PREFIX} properly uses the PREFIX variable, likely set by the package manager (e.g., conda).

Consider adding a version specification to ensure consistent builds:

-cargo install --verbose --path . --root ${PREFIX}
+cargo install --verbose --path . --root ${PREFIX} --version=${PKG_VERSION}

This assumes that PKG_VERSION is set elsewhere in the build environment, typically in the package metadata. If it's not available, you may need to hardcode the version or set it explicitly in this script.

recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (2)

8-10: LGTM: Source section is well-defined.

The URL structure is correct and uses the appropriate GitHub release tag format. The inclusion of the SHA256 checksum is crucial for integrity verification.

There's a typo in the summary on line 30: "grpahs" should be "graphs". Consider fixing this for better clarity.


21-23: Basic test is good, consider adding more comprehensive tests.

The current test command checks if gfainject --help runs successfully, which is a good basic smoke test to ensure the package is installed correctly.

Consider adding more comprehensive tests if possible. For example, you could test basic functionality with a small input file. This would provide greater confidence in the package's functionality after installation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 707c0fb and 995dba9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
recipes/gfainject/build.sh

[warning] 6-6: RUST_BACKTRACE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

(SC2034)

🪛 yamllint
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
recipes/gfainject/build.sh (2)

1-3: Excellent error handling and debugging setup!

The shebang and error handling options are well-configured:

  • The -euo options in the shebang ensure the script exits on errors, treats unset variables as errors, and fails pipelines if any command fails.
  • set -xe adds command printing for easier debugging.

These practices significantly improve the script's robustness and debuggability.


1-7: Overall, an effective and well-structured build script

This build script for gfainject is concise, focused, and includes good practices for error handling and debugging. It effectively utilizes Rust's cargo tool for building and installing the package.

The script demonstrates attention to detail with:

  1. Robust error handling and debugging options.
  2. Utilization of environment variables for flexible installation paths.
  3. Verbose output for better build process visibility.

With the minor suggested improvements (exporting RUST_BACKTRACE and considering version specification), this script provides a solid foundation for building the gfainject package in a reproducible manner.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck

[warning] 6-6: RUST_BACKTRACE appears unused. Verify use (or export if used externally).

(SC2034)

recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (5)

1-6: LGTM: Package and version declaration looks good.

The use of Jinja2 variables for name and version is a good practice for maintainability. The package name is correctly set to lowercase, and the version is appropriately set to 0.1.0 for an initial release.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


12-15: LGTM: Build section is well-configured.

The build number is correctly set to 0 for an initial release. The use of pin_subpackage in the run_exports section is a good practice for ensuring compatibility across different versions of the package.


33-38: LGTM: Extra section is well-defined.

The additional platforms (linux-aarch64 and osx-arm64) are correctly specified, which is helpful for cross-platform compatibility. The recipe maintainer is appropriately set to the PR author.


1-1: Note on yamllint error: Can be safely ignored.

The yamllint tool reported a syntax error for the '%' character. This is a false positive as the '%' is part of the Jinja2 templating syntax, which is valid and commonly used in Conda recipe files. No action is required to address this error.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


17-19: Build requirement looks good, but consider runtime requirements.

The Rust compiler is correctly specified as a build requirement. However, there are no runtime requirements specified.

Consider if there are any runtime dependencies that should be listed. If you're certain there are none, you can ignore this suggestion. Otherwise, you might want to add a host: and/or run: section under requirements:.

To verify if there are any runtime dependencies, we can check the project's Cargo.toml file:

Comment on lines 25 to 31
about:
home: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}
license: MIT
license_family: MIT
license_file: LICENSE
summary: Inject alignment into pangenome grpahs
dev_url: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Metadata looks good, but fix the typo in the summary.

The metadata provides comprehensive information about the package, including the correct GitHub repository URLs and license information.

There's a typo in the summary on line 30. Please apply the following fix:

-  summary: Inject alignment into pangenome grpahs
+  summary: Inject alignment into pangenome graphs
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
about:
home: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}
license: MIT
license_family: MIT
license_file: LICENSE
summary: Inject alignment into pangenome grpahs
dev_url: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}
about:
home: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}
license: MIT
license_family: MIT
license_file: LICENSE
summary: Inject alignment into pangenome graphs
dev_url: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (1)

21-23: Consider adding more comprehensive tests.

The current test command gfainject --help verifies that the package is installed and can be executed. However, it doesn't test any specific functionality of the tool. Consider adding more comprehensive tests to ensure the tool works as expected.

Would you like assistance in generating additional test commands to verify key functionalities of gfainject?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 995dba9 and 027209b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (6)

1-6: LGTM: Package and version section looks good.

The use of Jinja2 variables for the package name and version is a good practice, allowing for easier updates. Converting the package name to lowercase in the package section ensures consistency.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


8-10: LGTM: Source section is well-defined.

The source URL correctly points to a specific version tag on GitHub, and the inclusion of a SHA256 checksum ensures integrity verification. This is a good practice for security and reproducibility.


12-15: LGTM: Build section is properly configured.

The build number is correctly set to 0 for a new package. The use of pin_subpackage in the run_exports section is a good practice to ensure compatibility across different versions of the package.


25-31: LGTM: About section is comprehensive and accurate.

The about section provides all necessary information including the home page, license details, summary, and development URL. The previously reported typo in the summary has been corrected.


33-38: LGTM: Extra section provides valuable additional information.

The extra section correctly specifies additional supported platforms and lists the recipe maintainer. This information is valuable for users and other maintainers.


17-19: Verify run-time requirements.

The build requirement for the Rust compiler is correctly specified. However, there are no run-time requirements listed. Please verify if the package has any dependencies that should be listed under run requirements.

@AndreaGuarracino
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BiocondaBot please add label

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added the please review & merge set to ask for merge label Oct 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (2)

8-10: LGTM: Source section is well-defined.

The source URL and SHA256 checksum are correctly specified. The use of variables in the URL is a good practice for maintainability.

Consider adding a comment with the actual URL for easier reference:

source:
  url: https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/{{ name }}/archive/refs/tags/v{{ version }}.tar.gz
  # https://github.com/AndreaGuarracino/gfainject/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.0.tar.gz
  sha256: a4388e524d5942f53d2fa94a93b2e82c926506c27cfdf04c04fbe8669a7ecebf 

21-23: Test command is good, but consider adding more comprehensive tests.

The current test command gfainject --help is a good basic check to ensure the package is installed and can be executed.

Consider adding more comprehensive tests to verify the functionality of the package. For example:

test:
  commands:
    - gfainject --help
    - gfainject --version
    # Add more specific test commands here, e.g.:
    # - gfainject test_input.gfa test_alignments.bam -o test_output.gfa

Also, consider adding test files if needed:

  files:
    - test_input.gfa
    - test_alignments.bam
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 027209b and 2f4866f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • recipes/gfainject/build.sh
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (5)

1-6: LGTM: Package and version declaration looks good.

The package name and version are correctly defined using Jinja2 templating, which is a best practice for Conda recipes. The use of {{ name|lower }} ensures the package name is always in lowercase, which is important for consistency.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


12-15: LGTM: Build section is properly configured.

The build number is correctly set to 0 for the initial release. The use of pin_subpackage in the run_exports section is a good practice, ensuring that the package will be compatible with future minor version updates.


25-31: LGTM: About section is comprehensive and well-formatted.

The metadata provides all necessary information about the package, including:

  • Home page and development URL (correctly using the {{ name }} variable)
  • License information (MIT) with the license file specified
  • A concise and accurate summary of the package's functionality

The previously reported typo in the summary has been corrected.


33-38: LGTM: Extra section provides valuable additional information.

The extra section includes:

  • Additional supported platforms (linux-aarch64 and osx-arm64), which is helpful for users on different architectures.
  • The recipe maintainer is correctly specified.

This information enhances the package metadata and aids in maintainability.


17-19: Build requirement looks good, but consider runtime requirements.

The Rust compiler is correctly specified as a build requirement. However, there are no runtime requirements listed.

Consider if there are any runtime dependencies that should be listed. If there are none, it's good practice to explicitly state this. You can verify the runtime dependencies by checking the project's documentation or running the following command in the project's root directory:

If there are no runtime dependencies, consider adding an empty host: and run: section for clarity:

requirements:
  build:
    - {{ compiler('rust') }}
  host:
  run:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
please review & merge set to ask for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants