Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
In looking at these minimal ortholinear layouts, they appear to have three by five or six keys for each hand, so more than enough for all of the letters and punctuation. Is your question how to access the number and symbol-above-the-number keys? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Don't these ortholinear keyboards have 3 x 5 or 6 keys, which more than accommodate the 26 letters and common punctuation? Are you asking about how to accommodate numbers and the symbols above the numbers? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great questions! While you can move everything around wherever you would like to optimize to your own personal taste, there are advantages to keeping consistent with the symmetry in the full layout. I would try something simple at first, like try accessing the numbers and the symbols above the numbers from the home row and above the home row with a trigger key, like AltGr. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am considering using this layout with a more minimal ortholinear design such as the corne or gergoplex. I was going to try and adapt a layout from feelings and assumptions after trial and error once I create one and test it with engram. However I thought I should reach out and see if anybody has already considered applying the methodology to alternative smaller layouts to maximize the ergonomics of the additional layers.
Also has anybody made considerations for modifier keys or even key-down/up events. I.E. using xcape (to escape when
ctrl
is tapped and act as ctrl when held down) these could double up thumb keys ieBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions