Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify whether Pasternak et al should be cited with Free-water DTI model description #16

Closed
oesteban opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@oesteban
Copy link
Collaborator

Comes from #5 (comment)

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator

arokem commented Apr 25, 2023

I believe that the Hoy and Pasternak methods would produce the same parameters: f for the free water fraction + 6 tensor parameters, so I think that we can cite both Hoy and Pasternak for this.

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator

arokem commented Apr 25, 2023

Besides, it looks like fwdti is currently out of scope, so closing.

@arokem arokem closed this as completed Apr 25, 2023
@Lestropie
Copy link
Collaborator

it looks like fwdti is currently out of scope

If tensor were to become a data representation rather than a model (#74), then free water DTI would be immediately supported. It would just be a mixture model with two components, one of which is a scalar and the other is a tensor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants