You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The text for 01-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data.md defines PartialFourier as The fraction of partial Fourier information collected. Corresponds to DICOM Tag 0018, 9081. Be aware that 0018,9081 is an enumerated type of YES/NO not a fraction, e.g. (0018,9081) CS [YES]. Might be worth spelling this out, e.g. scan acquired with 5/8 Partial Fourier would report 0.625. I am not aware of a public tag that reports the desired value (for Siemens one can look at the CSA header).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@neurolabusc great catch! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I also could not find any generic tag for the partial Fourier fraction, that corresponds to the current description.
I am not sure how widely this metadata is used by the existing data. Depending on the answer, backwards compatibility may prevent us from a complete redefinition. If anything, we can drop Corresponds to DICOM Tag 0018, 9081 to avoid confusion and improve the description.
Yes, I would simply drop the reference to the DICOM Tag. At the moment, dcm2niix reliably reports the PartialFourier for Siemens (ucPhasePartialFourier in CSA header). I would be happy to hear if anyone knows how to determine this for Philips or GE.
The text for 01-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data.md defines PartialFourier as
The fraction of partial Fourier information collected. Corresponds to DICOM Tag 0018, 9081
. Be aware that 0018,9081 is an enumerated type of YES/NO not a fraction, e.g.(0018,9081) CS [YES]
. Might be worth spelling this out, e.g. scan acquired with 5/8 Partial Fourier would report 0.625. I am not aware of a public tag that reports the desired value (for Siemens one can look at the CSA header).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: