Skip to content

ssh hacks to automate auditing devices for medical records, make the archive transport independent

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

bewest/insulaudit-ssh-tools

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

39 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

ssh + git hacks

Quick intro

This method automatically forwards serial device over ssh for one-time consumption. After resource is consumed once, all ports and sessions are closed cleanly.

The resource can only be consumed once using this implementation; the whole pipeline is shut-down after a single open/close session on the virtual modem.

Details

See:

system sequence part1 system sequence part2

Help

Integrate with compound document formats

Also see

authorized_keys

Gitolite and svnserve use this technique to map an authenticated key to a specified user by setting up the entire shell so that it's customized for the user.

See: http://sitaramc.github.com/gitolite/auth.html

Now, if you managed to read about gitolite and ssh, you know that
gitolite is meant to be invoked as:

/full/path/to/gitolite-shell some-authenticated-gitolite-username
(where the "gitolite username" is a "virtual" username; it does not
have to be, and usually isn't, an actual unix username).

Part of "user setup" or registration has to be adding an entry for the user's beagle bone key to our authorized_keys_ file

For example, This entry prevents bash or sh from running. Usually what happens is ssh will start bash as the new user.

EG a normal session:

bewest@paragon:~/src$ ssh [email protected] 'whoami ; env ; echo
$SHELL'
insulaudit
MAIL=/var/mail/insulaudit
USER=insulaudit
SSH_CLIENT=24.5.43.241 53043 22
HOME=/home/insulaudit
LOGNAME=insulaudit
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/sh
PWD=/home/insulaudit
SSH_CONNECTION=24.5.43.241 53043 10.170.185.103 22
/bin/sh
bewest@paragon:~/src$ 

With the authorized_keys:

command="FOO=BAR /home/insulaudit/bin/do_audit_for.sh bewest" ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQDSZh82PI+uQe62fNvmqNNdB6mpPjJfpoPlxt515PVKjUpE49YQUXpdkbOYNHGtT5cRWdvEBJ7zVyJt0Iiy2cUVZjO2dgd/+iKwTNbFXvk9WyKP/MRwij3AHrf+nMMg9csz0qQ5JwRqBktjOuf3Vxkrf/bkUROxnvj1CU3SDNe7NUx7aGF/awwnQ19vzS/T6oCUct+ivGNWX+ZBLVLeWzPxm4T88Lw6v/ASWeHRydVtEoAOj66F1EP1R429EwBnasZi1a6sqeh3H8wNtqysaN4ultrOPsQldENKOTApZbjtAEL5u03m+/gRxu0PGymDhUFSn08ruwB8qxAedwfS4D9P bewest@ip-10-170-185-103

command="FOO=BAR /home/insulaudit/bin/do_audit_for.sh bewest" ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQDIvYgpg7C+4qqpGAelfX9BilYe4Qs6pJlOlLyZU553w+dmCBb3JGfcMoT8ppBse3N/MTY+DhZ6pfSq//h81wQdj1ieSn6TshCzUyt/crbp+5VPUobj8Y/3DiByiNgnGmY6L17qab3OMCK7ns/+WGWkfGYmN2XFxqbVpENTE2AYyOMkl++VFi+B5UTuqR3XLhlVj1xY0928tEpxKKZIfJaKgcIfxkgVM9fQnH3z/kFM1AIER4oB933CROlln9CXKTFOODUvWk8Xqh2R88DxjcCbaNUrBrsMDvqfb5z3mFKWPhaNgi8Y4gsNiDCgZpsoZJV/uXQRGtdTvfNWHgtCoXcD bewest@paragon

bewest@ip-10-170-185-103:~/src/insulaudit$ ssh insulaudit 'whoami ; env ; echo $SHELL'
$0: /home/insulaudit/bin/do_audit_for.sh
key: bewest
args: bewest
args: bewest
ENV
SHELL=/bin/sh
FOO=BAR
SSH_CLIENT=184.169.177.192 46828 22
USER=insulaudit
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
MAIL=/var/mail/insulaudit
PWD=/home/insulaudit
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHLVL=1
HOME=/home/insulaudit
SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND=whoami ; env ; echo $SHELL
LOGNAME=insulaudit
SSH_CONNECTION=184.169.177.192 46828 10.170.185.103 22
_=/usr/bin/env
THIS IS MY SPECIAL LOGIN SHELL. HANGING UP.
bewest@ip-10-170-185-103:~/src/insulaudit$

So we are able to take initialize a specified shell session with our authenticated user. All we need to do now is authorise some ports for auditing.

Here's stack overflow on the subject:

restricting shell access/distinguishing one user from another

The answer to the first question is the command= we talked about
before. If you look in the authorized_keys file, you'll see entries
like this (I chopped off the ends of course; they're pretty long
lines):

  command="[path]/gitolite-shell sitaram",[more options] ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAQEA18S2t...
  command="[path]/gitolite-shell usertwo",[more options] ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAQEArXtCT...
First, it finds out which of the public keys in this file match the
incoming login. That's crypto stuff, and I won't go into it. Once the
match has been found, it will run the command given on that line;
e.g., if I logged in, it would run [path]/gitolite-shell sitaram. So
the first thing to note is that such users do not get "shell access",
which is good!

Before running the command, however, sshd sets up an environment
variable called SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND which contains the actual git
command that your workstation sent out. This is the command that would
have run if you did not have the command= part in the authorised keys
file.

When gitolite-shell gets control, it looks at the first argument
("sitaram", "usertwo", etc) to determine who you are. It then looks at
the SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND variable to find out which repository you
want to access, and whether you're reading or writing.

Now that it has a user, repository, and access requested (read/write),
gitolite looks at its config file, and either allows or rejects the
request.

But this cannot differentiate between different branches within a
repo; that has to be done separately.

Updating authorized keys

https://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite/blob/master/src/triggers/post-compile/ssh-authkeys Looks like @sitaramc tries very hard to keep duplicate entries out, and to keep the "curated" list separate from any manually added entries.

gitolite

You can emulate gitolite-shell manually by doing something like like this SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND="$action" gitolite-shell bewest This actually runs as user git, but gitolite knows to set up all following commands as the "bewest" user. It looks in it's config files for all needed information at this point, although it can interact with some out of band service as well.

Action here is something like "upload, recieve, etc...."

Extending gitolite

Proposed extensions?

Some ideas on how to transition these scripts to be gitolite commands

  • upload-helper []

  • burn-branch <branch-name> <helper> - burn a branch into a repo using this idiom:

git init new-content
cd new-content
# burn a branch
git checkout -b audit-branch && git status || git checkout audit-branch
# run ${HELPER}
HELPER='echo "new content" new-content/incoming.log'
${HELPER}
git add -v .
git commit -avm 'burned new content into my branch'
cd ..
git clone --bare [email protected]:myrepo.git remote.git
# something like
git --git-dir remote.git remote add local new-content
git --git-dir fetch local
git --git-dir rebase --onto audit-branch audit-branch..local/audit-branch
git --git-dir push origin audit-branch
# test -n $DEBUG && git --git-dir push -f origin audit-branch #???
  • stitch-branch <onto> <branch-name> <helper> - specify a domain specific helper to resolve differences in newly generated content (eg, for regular auditing, where conflicts can be regularly resolved automatically.)
# something like
git --git-dir rebase --onto audit-branch audit-branch..local/audit-branch
${HELPER}
git add -v .
git commit -avm 'burned new content into my branch'
git rebase --continue

git hacks

This one is interesting: https://github.com/progrium/gitreceive/blob/master/gitreceive

How to check in medical records using beaglebone

Take a stab at the overall workflow for what happens when the beaglebone "goes live".

Theory of operation is that given some message with a server, we want to exchange keys and generate a new valid config. Then we use the config to start up an auditing session. An auditing session consists of connecting the local hardware with a remote server process that can perform the device-specific auditing.

These steps are a suggestion on how to generate a "valid config" given an SMS, and how to trigger the server-side process.

Config

Assume this config:

[deviceDetect]
vid=1111
pid=2222

[resourceRequest]
addr=bewest.io
port=80
audit=medevice://[email protected]:9001/insulauditpage=audit.php
userid=bew
key_loc=12739022

[serialToNet]
addr=bewest.io
port=9001

[registration]
addr=bewest.io
pollinginterval=300
[email protected]:bewest/diabetes-phr.git
firstname=Ben
lastname=West

So now that do_audit_for knows to set up a user, it needs to set up a new work area.

BASE=/home/insulaudit/
USER=bewest
KEY=12739022 # some unique key
WORK=$BASE/$USER-$KEY
mkdir -p $WORK
[email protected]:bewest/diabetes.git
git clone $PHR_REMOTE $WORK
cd $WORK
BRANCH="audit-$KEY"
git checkout -b $BRANCH

Given a port forward, we can set up a vmodem

USER=$USER
DEVICE=$BASE/devices/$USER-$KEY.ttyUSB
PORT=9001
socat pty,link=$DEVICE,b9600,raw TCP-L:$PORT

Then run insulaudit to audit some records from a medical device.

VID=1111
PID=2222
guess=$(insulaudit guess --vid $VID --pid $PID)
tool=${guess-"mini.py"}
OUTPUT=$WORK/insulaudit-$(date +%F).log
$tool $DEVICE > $OUTPUT

Then wrap it up, and send the phr back from whence it came.

cd $WORK
summarize_audit $OUTPUT > summary.log
make_manifest $USER $SESSION . > manifest.phr
git add .
git commit -F summary.log
git push origin $BRANCH

Hmm, kill socat, clean up work??

cd
# we hope this kills socat on both remote and local side
rm $DEVICE
rm -Rf $WORK

This ssh config allows ssh command like: ssh insulaudit

Host insulaudit

  Compression no
  User insulaudit
  Hostname bewest.io
  IdentityFile /home/bewest/.ssh/insulaudit.key
  # LocalForward 4142 localhost:4142  # eg $port

We use something like this from the beaglebone to connect to the server. The idea is that socat has forwarded a pty to a TCP interface, and that ssh stitches the port onto a remote host where relevant services can make the best use of the connected device.

About

ssh hacks to automate auditing devices for medical records, make the archive transport independent

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published