Skip to content

reflection: what to do about dynamic types #12054

soqb started this conversation in Ideas
Feb 22, 2024 · 11 comments · 3 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 11 comments 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@cBournhonesque
Comment options

@MrGVSV
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@soqb
Comment options

soqb Mar 30, 2024
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Ideas
Labels
C-Feature A new feature, making something new possible A-Reflection Runtime information about types X-Controversial There is active debate or serious implications around merging this PR
4 participants