Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
locking/rtmutex: Use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner()
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
While debugging the rtmutex unlock vs. dequeue race Will suggested to use
READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner() as it might race against the
cmpxchg_release() in unlock_rt_mutex_safe().

Will: "It's a minor thing which will most likely not matter in practice"

Careful search did not unearth an actual problem in todays code, but it's
better to be safe than surprised.

Suggested-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: David Daney <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
KAGA-KOKO authored and Ingo Molnar committed Dec 2, 2016
1 parent dbb2605 commit 1be5d4f
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 2 deletions.
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)

static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
return (struct task_struct *)
((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL);
unsigned long owner = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(lock->owner);

return (struct task_struct *) (owner & ~RT_MUTEX_OWNER_MASKALL);
}

/*
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 1be5d4f

Please sign in to comment.