You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing this method and useful software.
I want to ask some questions about the choice of the outgroup. I want to use NCD2 to detect the signature of balancing selection in the genome of a fish species. There is a sister species that has a divergent time of 2 MYA to my fish species, and this species also have a similar trait that is hypothesized under balancing selection. However, I will only focus on my species, since there are not enough samples of its sister species. Do you think is it appropriate to use its sister species as an outgroup? Does the divergent time (2 MYA) matter? And a more important question, should I choose another species without the candidate trait of interest as an outgroup, or it doesn't matter since even though the same gene contributes to this trait in two species, the substitutions should be different since the surrounding loci are caused by mutations.
Thanks in advance!
Best wishes,
Xiaomeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! The outgroup is used in NCD2 (but not NCD2). NCD2 outperforms NCD1, so is preferable. The way this information is used is as follows:
you only need one individual from the sister species. So if that is available, it is enough. The information you need is the number of fixed differences between that species and your species for every window you query.
Regarding the fact that the sister species might potentially also be under balancing selection at this locus, I have not explored this. My intuition is that then both species should have a reduced number of FDs relative to the number of SNPs. This may or may not be a problem, depending on what you are comparing your candidate locus to. If, as you said, there might be another sister group to use, then maybe do that.
Divergence time. You want the two species to be sufficiently diverged for you to have the signature. At least 4xNe generations, where Ne is the effective population size of your species and the sister species. For example, in humans the long-term Ne is roughly 10,000, so 4x10,000=40,000 generations. To convert this to years you need to multiply this by the generation time. If we consider this to be 25 years for humans, we get 1,000,000 (1 million years). The sister species we use for humans is chimp and human and chimp diverged from their common ancestor at least 6 million years ago, so this is appropriate.
Dear Bárbara,
Thank you for developing this method and useful software.
I want to ask some questions about the choice of the outgroup. I want to use NCD2 to detect the signature of balancing selection in the genome of a fish species. There is a sister species that has a divergent time of 2 MYA to my fish species, and this species also have a similar trait that is hypothesized under balancing selection. However, I will only focus on my species, since there are not enough samples of its sister species. Do you think is it appropriate to use its sister species as an outgroup? Does the divergent time (2 MYA) matter? And a more important question, should I choose another species without the candidate trait of interest as an outgroup, or it doesn't matter since even though the same gene contributes to this trait in two species, the substitutions should be different since the surrounding loci are caused by mutations.
Thanks in advance!
Best wishes,
Xiaomeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: