Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bazel 8 compatibility (fork of #283) #284

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

ted-xie
Copy link
Contributor

@ted-xie ted-xie commented Nov 26, 2024

No description provided.

ahumesky and others added 18 commits December 5, 2024 12:44
- Latest versions of rules_java, protobuf, rules_proto, bazel-worker-api, rules_go, gazelle, rules_python, absl, rules_shell, rules_cc
- Use "com_google_protobuf" instead of "protobuf" throughout for compatibility between WORKSPACE and bzlmod
- Rearrange WORKSPACE dependencies to account for above updates
- Add minimal necessary loads and WORKSPACE dependencies to example basicapp. rules_java deps and rules_jvm_external deps must be in the top-level WORKSPACE file to avoid circular load dependencies
Currently relies on git_override and commit archive. Needs a rules_go
release containing bazel-contrib/rules_go#4182
to fully productionize.
@ted-xie ted-xie changed the title Test bazel 8 compatibility (fork of #283) Bazel 8 compatibility (fork of #283) Dec 5, 2024
@ted-xie ted-xie marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 18:13
@copybara-service copybara-service bot closed this in 53cd4dc Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants