Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results of the Discovery API as RDF #51

Open
enridaga opened this issue Nov 4, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Results of the Discovery API as RDF #51

enridaga opened this issue Nov 4, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@enridaga
Copy link
Contributor

enridaga commented Nov 4, 2015

Implement an RDF version of the results of the discovery API.
Possibly using:

@enridaga enridaga added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 4, 2015
@LaurensRietveld
Copy link

+1. How does this relate to #50 ?
Would this RDF data via e.g. a SPARQL endpoint replace the search API?

@enridaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

enridaga commented Nov 5, 2015

When a request asks for an RDF format, the response will be an RDF graph using SPIN+LSQ instead of a tabular list of APIs and hits. This might be incoherent with the actual response format, that is a plain JSON including the list of APIs and details about the hits in the text.
I don't think this is a problem, as the plain JSON will be used to display the search results, while the RDF formats for other use cases.

Adding a SPARQL endpoint to query the query catalogue would be a nice feature, but it would require a bit of work, so I won't put this requirement as a dependency right now, and we might reuse the code needed to generate the RDF descriptions to populate it. I think we should go incrementally.

Similarly, we might use these descriptions to provide a /meta subresource for each query, as figured on #13 .

@enridaga enridaga modified the milestones: v0.4.0, v1.0.0 Sep 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants