You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a request asks for an RDF format, the response will be an RDF graph using SPIN+LSQ instead of a tabular list of APIs and hits. This might be incoherent with the actual response format, that is a plain JSON including the list of APIs and details about the hits in the text.
I don't think this is a problem, as the plain JSON will be used to display the search results, while the RDF formats for other use cases.
Adding a SPARQL endpoint to query the query catalogue would be a nice feature, but it would require a bit of work, so I won't put this requirement as a dependency right now, and we might reuse the code needed to generate the RDF descriptions to populate it. I think we should go incrementally.
Similarly, we might use these descriptions to provide a /meta subresource for each query, as figured on #13 .
Implement an RDF version of the results of the discovery API.
Possibly using:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: