Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[meta] Entities (and Entity API) Roadmap #1649

Open
3 of 10 tasks
mikemccaffrey opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 4 comments
Open
3 of 10 tasks

[meta] Entities (and Entity API) Roadmap #1649

mikemccaffrey opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@mikemccaffrey
Copy link

mikemccaffrey commented Feb 22, 2016

This is a follow up to the original meta for integrating Entity API into core (#49), and also the request for porting over all of the remaining functionality (#1371).

1.x

2.x-future:

@mikemccaffrey mikemccaffrey added this to the 1.4.0 milestone Feb 22, 2016
@mikemccaffrey mikemccaffrey changed the title [meta] Entity improvements for v1.4.0 [meta] Entities and Entity API Roadmap Feb 23, 2016
@mikemccaffrey
Copy link
Author

I'd like us to break down all of the remaining parts of Entity API that have not been ported, create tickets for each, and decide on how to provide the functionality in backdrop, either by moving the feature into core, or including it in an Entity API module that is specifically designed to assist with easing the migration of entity-intensive drupal modules to backdrop.

@mikemccaffrey mikemccaffrey removed this from the 1.4.0 milestone Feb 23, 2016
@mikemccaffrey mikemccaffrey changed the title [meta] Entities and Entity API Roadmap [meta] Entities (and Entity API) Roadmap Feb 23, 2016
@sentaidigital
Copy link

I am trying to port date_ical and discovered that entity_view() hasn't been ported. I've opened a ticket for it (#1739). Should we add it to this roadmap meta issue?

@mikemccaffrey mikemccaffrey added this to the 1.6-references milestone Oct 2, 2016
@jenlampton jenlampton removed this from the entities-and-references milestone Jan 16, 2019
@laryn
Copy link
Contributor

laryn commented Apr 11, 2019

Backdrop's core entity module leaves out some revision-related functions. Is that intentional? e.g. entity_revision_load

I'm debugging in paragraphs and rather than just copy that function (or those functions, there may be more than one) into paragraphs, which doesn't seem right, should I PR them to core? Or do they belong in entity_plus?

backdrop-contrib/paragraphs#33

EDIT: @herbdool suggests entity_plus (on Gitter)

@klonos
Copy link
Member

klonos commented Apr 11, 2019

I wouldn't mind moving the most commonly-used functions into core if multiple contrib are using them. Same with whatever we've left out of CTools. The less contrib developers have to worry about, the better DX.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants