-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
generator-star should ignore transpiled async/await functions #78
Comments
Should |
Certainly not. It's way too risky as they change so much and it'd mostly require replacing the entire rule. I'm not sure if this specific issue can be addressed since you have to turn await expressions/async functions into something and the likely equivalent is a yield/generator. |
Yeah agree. Although I guess people will ask since
|
I guess we'll just close for now? |
would be great if there were a "known rule conflicts" list in the readme so i know just to not use this rule when using babel. no biggie. |
@jonathanong That sounds like a good idea. I already made a comment about using the react plugin for jsx issues. Would you like to make a PR to start the list? |
Instead of patching eslint rules, what about a babel plugin that adds comments to disable the rule for that expression ( |
👍 for @matthewwithanm comment |
@jonathanong Ok I added the rule to the Unless I'm misunderstanding how it would work, I don't get how the plugin would help with the errors? The babel plugin would transform your generated file to have the comments while the source file wouldn't have them - and eslint is usually run on the source file itself? |
Just notifying people here that there's now a https://github.com/babel/eslint-plugin-babel - will try to reimplement rules as a plugin (similar to eslint-plugin-react). I will add a note in the readme about it. |
@hzoo Awesome, thanks! |
Apparently, this still happens even with |
getting this error:
instead, this rule should somehow be ignored with transpiled async/await functions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: