Add missing mixin relationships #1323
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mixin relationships can exist on any shape but we only created a relationship for structure and union. This also attempts to ensure that the list of relationships is created with sufficient capacity to avoiding needing to resize the array as rels are computed and added.
sugmanue
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mixin relationships can exist on any shape but we only created
a relationship for structure and union. This also attempts to
ensure that the list of relationships is created with sufficient
capacity to avoiding needing to resize the array as rels are
computed and added.
Issue #, if available:
Description of changes:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.