-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Support more robust searching #7
Comments
We have observed the following issue, which we think falls into the category of more robust search support. When searching using reference parameters it is not performing an exact match of the referenced resource ID. For example, all of the following return the same set of resources:
|
Hello! @lwarren01 this bug is exactly what I need to do in the project that I'm working for. @rsmayda Do we have a solution forecast for this case? Would there be any way to help you? Due to the progress of the project I'm working on, I have a certain urgency to have this functionality |
@lwarren01 & @luisberga thanks for calling this out we will try to reproduce it this week and get back to you |
@lwarren01 & @luisberga , the exact reference match was brought up on a separate issue: awslabs/fhir-works-on-aws-deployment#329. The fix for it has been released on [email protected] |
We are seeing references with logical E.G: POST AuditEvent w/agent.who logical identifier reference
|
It seems search parameters that have "-" are not supported. For example In the Group resource, there is a search parameter called "characteristic-value". And I cannot use this parameter |
We would like to see the contains string search added: [base]/Patient?given:contains=eve Any patients with a name with a given part containing "eve" at any position. This would include patients with the given name "Eve", "Evelyn", and also "Severine". Of course it would be nice to support all 3 string search scenarios mentioned in 3.1.1.4.8:
|
FHIR Works on AWS has been moved to maintenance mode. While in maintenance, we will not add any new features to this solution. All security issues should be reported directly to AWS Security at [email protected]. If you are new to this solution, we advise you to explore using HealthLake, which is our managed service for building FHIR based transactional and analytics applications. You can get started by contacting your AWS Account team. If you are an existing customer |
Currently our search is completed by using 'keyword'. This leaves much to be desired and required from the FHIR spec. Such as:
Date range search(feat: support Period type fields for date params #61)Greater/less than quantity search(feat: support number and quantity type parameters #58)date type field
only (feat: allow sorting by date type parameters #60)FHIR spec for context:
A/C:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: