chore(governance): add new maintenance issue template for tech debt and governance #1326
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/L
heitorlessa
changed the title
heitorlessa
changed the title
heitorlessa
requested review from
am29d and
rubenfonseca
and removed request for
am29d
|
These changes look good to me. It will be revisited when e2e finishes because I think new labels will be added. But for now it's nice. |
rubenfonseca
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2022
|
Thank you both! Merging |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue number: #1009
Summary
Changes
Introduces a new issue template to better classify all work related to governance, automation, internal, and tech debt. This will allow us to migrate issues in #1009 and on public board. These haven't been converted to issues due to not belonging to existing templates.
Question: Should we keep
internallabel for these or create a new label?Pros of keeping
internal: Already defined in MAINTAINERS.md, PR and Release drafting automationUser experience
Checklist
If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.
Is this a breaking change?
RFC issue number:
Checklist:
Acknowledgment
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.
View rendered MAINTAINERS.md