Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EKS] [Feature Request]: Enable feature gates TTLAfterFinished #248

Closed
Looooopy opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

[EKS] [Feature Request]: Enable feature gates TTLAfterFinished #248

Looooopy opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
Duplicate / Merged Duplicate issue EKS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Proposed Community submitted issue

Comments

@Looooopy
Copy link

Tell us about your request
I would be able to enable feature gates TTLAfterFinished

Which service(s) is this request for?
EKS

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve. What are you trying to do, and why is it hard?
Jobs that are "Complete" or "Failed" should be removed automatically.
It takes up unnecessary resources, if they are left there.

Are you currently working around this issue?
Manually remove the jobs.

Additional context
List of feature gates, TTLAfterFinished
https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/feature-gates/

@Looooopy Looooopy added the Proposed Community submitted issue label Apr 15, 2019
@abby-fuller abby-fuller added the EKS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service label Apr 19, 2019
@scravy
Copy link

scravy commented Feb 28, 2021

This is a duplicate of #255

@tabern
Copy link
Contributor

tabern commented Jul 22, 2021

This feature launched in v1.20 - see #255 (comment)

@tabern tabern closed this as completed Jul 22, 2021
@tabern tabern added the Duplicate / Merged Duplicate issue label Jul 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Duplicate / Merged Duplicate issue EKS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Proposed Community submitted issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants