Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crash while opening pycharm project #5088

Open
thehesiod opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Crash while opening pycharm project #5088

thehesiod opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.

Comments

@thehesiod
Copy link

Describe the bug
I got this AWS toolkit crash while opening a pycharm project

To reproduce

Expected behavior
no-crash

Screenshots

Your Environment

  • OS: OSX 15.1
  • JetBrains product: PyCharm
  • JetBrains product version: 2024.3 Build #PY-243.21565.199, built on November 12, 2024
  • AWS Toolkit version: 3.39-243
  • SAM CLI version:
  • JVM/Python version: 21.0.5+8-b631.16 aarch64 (JCEF 122.1.9)
    VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o.

Additional context

com.intellij.diagnostic.PluginException: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag: id="aws.toolkit.dynamoViewer.changeMaxResults" class="software.aws.toolkits.jetbrains.services.dynamodb.editor.actions.ConfigureMaxResultsAction" [Plugin: aws.toolkit]
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.ActionStub.initAction(ActionStub.java:108)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.convertStub(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1714)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:2198)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.access$getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1)
	at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImpl.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:411)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invokeSuspend(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:378)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.intrinsics.UndispatchedKt.startUndispatchedOrReturn(Undispatched.kt:62)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__Builders_commonKt.withContext(Builders.common.kt:163)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.withContext(Unknown Source)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:377)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.access$loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:35)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1$1.emit(Emitters.kt:220)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:219)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:223)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__BuildersKt$asFlow$$inlined$unsafeFlow$3.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:114)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invokeSuspend(Emitters.kt:36)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
	at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SafeFlow.collectSafely(Builders.kt:57)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.AbstractFlow.collect(Flow.kt:226)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperatorImpl.flowCollect(ChannelFlow.kt:191)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo$suspendImpl(ChannelFlow.kt:153)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo(ChannelFlow.kt)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlow$collectToFun$1.invokeSuspend(ChannelFlow.kt:56)
	at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:104)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.internal.LimitedDispatcher$Worker.run(LimitedDispatcher.kt:111)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.TaskImpl.run(Tasks.kt:99)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely(CoroutineScheduler.kt:608)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask(CoroutineScheduler.kt:873)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker(CoroutineScheduler.kt:763)
	at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run(CoroutineScheduler.kt:750)

would be nice if you guys enabled reporting directly via pycharm

@thehesiod thehesiod added the bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug. label Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant