Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DynamoDB add one map AttributeValueMemberMI{ Value map[int64]AttributeValue} #1570

Closed
1 task
swm888 opened this issue Jan 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task
Labels
closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. duplicate This issue is a duplicate. feature-request A feature should be added or improved.

Comments

@swm888
Copy link

swm888 commented Jan 22, 2022

Describe the feature

type AttributeValueMemberMI struct {
	Value map[int64]AttributeValue

	noSmithyDocumentSerde
}

Is your Feature Request related to a problem?

I'm always frustrated when MarshalMap map's key is int type.

Proposed Solution

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Acknowledge

  • I may be able to implement this feature request

AWS Go SDK version used

aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodb v1.13.0

Go version used

go version go1.17.5 darwin/arm64

@swm888 swm888 added feature-request A feature should be added or improved. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Jan 22, 2022
@jasdel
Copy link
Contributor

jasdel commented Feb 16, 2022

Thanks for taking the time to create this issue @sun-fight. The SDK cannot add a AttributeValueMemberMI member type as these are defined by the Amazon DynamoDB API. With that said there are issue, #645 and #411 that cover this concept of using non string types as keys for AttributeValueMemberM maps.

@jasdel jasdel added duplicate This issue is a duplicate. closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. and removed needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Feb 16, 2022
@swm888 swm888 closed this as completed Feb 17, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closing-soon This issue will automatically close in 4 days unless further comments are made. duplicate This issue is a duplicate. feature-request A feature should be added or improved.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants