Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put releases on a timeline manner #44

Open
Negan1911 opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Put releases on a timeline manner #44

Negan1911 opened this issue Apr 12, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Negan1911
Copy link

Negan1911 commented Apr 12, 2022

I don't believe that a year has passed, and we don't have a single freaking word about node16 on lambdas. #14 & #33.

I feel bad for the devs waiting on Python 3.10 #31 or Java 17 #29. No f*king talk that the current node12 and 14 versions are outdated and insecure and had already opened CVE's #28

What we should do so AWS put their shit together and release software in a timely manner?

@dl748
Copy link

dl748 commented Apr 12, 2022

While I can't condone the wording, I definitely understand the frustration. Hell, I'm frustrated.

As for constructive criticism.

I almost feel that when they offered layers, updating runtimes became a secondary backburner.

Unfortunately, rolling your own marks against you in the 250 meg max limitation. Where base images did not count.

And it amazes me that AWS is touted as the automation king for services, doesn't have this automated in such a way that it just spits something out a week after release with only intervention when there is an error.

@Negan1911
Copy link
Author

Negan1911 commented Apr 12, 2022

If you told me that these people are running an OSS is totally understandable, but these people offer a bunch of services; once you got vendor-locked, they kindly forget that you basically exist.

They didn't produced a concrete answer after a full year of that release, I remember with node 12 was the same.

People are trusting their companies to AWS and they can't release software in a timely manner, we're not even talking about days but a full blown year.

One thing is if they were having troubles or something, but they're deliberately ignoring theirs customers

I almost feel that when they offered layers, updating runtimes became a secondary backburner.

Yeah but theirs solution is "serverless", I shouldn't be worrying about layers and base images unless I really want to. Even more, Layers are not supported on Lambda@Edge (which we use for Cloudfront), adds some cold start time and are a burden to maintain

@dl748
Copy link

dl748 commented Apr 12, 2022

Yeah I believe Node 12 was released last February. But I agree, I mean I keep hearing how much money they are pulling in from AWS on the News all the time.

Personally, I'd like them to open up the source on the branches they've created here so people can submit new ones. Similar to how you can contribute to the SDKs. I'm not sure why its not done here.

@jaikanthjay46
Copy link

The base image has 34 critical vulnerabilities published several months ago, but the latest base image was published like 3 days ago without patching them. @carlzogh @krk Can you look into it ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants