Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python: Misc. files #738

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Python: Misc. files #738

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

lucasmcdonald3
Copy link
Contributor

@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 commented Sep 19, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Looking through both #550 and #360, these are "cleanup" changes to close the gap of reviewed code.

Python files:

  • Add init, move tests, update tox.ini. (I don't expect these to be worrisome to reviewers)

Updated non-Python files:

  • Removed .github/workflows files. These must have been removed on main between when I last merged in and now. See current main branch.
  • Removed codegen patches: These must have been removed on main between when I last merged in and now. See current main branch:
  • Updated .NET MPL TestVectors .csproj: This is updating to what is on the main branch: link

Squash/merge commit message, if applicable:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

@lucasmcdonald3, I noticed you are updating the smithy model files.
Does this update need new or updated javadoc trait documentation?
Are you adding constraints inside list, map or union? Do you know about this issue: smithy-lang/smithy-dafny#491?

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

Copy link

Detected changes to the release files or to the check-files action

Copy link

Changes to the release files or the check-files action requires 2 approvals from CODEOWNERS

@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 21:44
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 21:44
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 merged commit 4b4935d into python-reviewed Sep 19, 2024
40 of 63 checks passed
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 deleted the python-cleanup branch September 19, 2024 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants