Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create secondary ENI when previous ENI isn't full due to lack of IPs in subnet - enhanced subnet discovery #2908

Closed
jchen6585 opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@jchen6585
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to be added:
When enhanced subnet discovery is enabled, we should create a secondary ENI using a new subnet (if there is one available) when the previous ENI is failing to add more IPs due to lack of IPs in subnet.

Why is this needed:
This will prevent IPAMD from being stuck trying to allocate IPs to the previous ENI even if the subnet is out of IPs.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 14 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Issue or PR is stale label Jul 6, 2024
Copy link

Issue closed due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 20, 2024
@orsenthil orsenthil reopened this Jul 20, 2024
@yieon-lyon
Copy link

If you provide this method, I think there will be any problems with IP loss for existing instances.
But before understanding this, we must first carefully manage subnet configuration. with cidr ...

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Issue or PR is stale label Jul 26, 2024
@orsenthil
Copy link
Member

orsenthil commented Jul 31, 2024

This is addressed in https://github.com/aws/amazon-vpc-cni-k8s

Edit:
#2954

Copy link

This issue is now closed. Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.

@dougbyrne
Copy link
Contributor

I think the previous link was meant to be #2954

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants