Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AWS::CloudFront::Distribution - CacheBehavior-TrustedKeyGroups #686

Closed
ctd opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

AWS::CloudFront::Distribution - CacheBehavior-TrustedKeyGroups #686

ctd opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@ctd
Copy link

ctd commented Nov 18, 2020

Scope of request

AWS::CloudFront::Distribution-CacheBehavior does not support the TrustedKeyGroups attribute that's in the underlying the CloudFront API.

Amazon CloudFront launched the key groups feature on Oct 22, 2020.

The key groups feature would also be best supported by additional resource types to manage the key groups themselves, I will create a separate issue for this (#687). This issue is specifically for specifying existing key groups in a distribution configuration.

Expected behavior

The behaviours should be the same as for the existing TrustedSigners attribute, but affecting the TrustedKeyGroups attribute in the CloudFront Distribution Configuration.

On Create and Update, it should include the TrustedKeyGroups attribute values in the DistributionConfig that is sent to the CloudFront service.

Ideally, the Quantity attribute is calculated by the CloudFormation resource.

Suggest specific test cases

The behaviours (and tests) should be the same as for the existing TrustedSigners attribute.

Helpful Links to speed up research and evaluation

Category

Networking & Content (CloudFront)

@WaelA WaelA added the Coverage label Aug 3, 2021
@WaelA WaelA changed the title AWS::CloudFront::Distribution-CacheBehavior-TrustedKeyGroups AWS::CloudFront::Distribution - CacheBehavior-TrustedKeyGroups Aug 4, 2021
@bbalka
Copy link

bbalka commented Sep 21, 2021

@ctd
Copy link
Author

ctd commented Sep 21, 2021

It looks like that was added after this issue was created. I'm not actively working on anything that would use this type but it looks like what I recall needing, so I think this can be resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants