You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1 At the end of section 5.1 there is a mention to Nat.count_factors_mul_of_pos which I can't #check, and is not used at all in the following (supposedly related) example:
example {m n k r : ℕ} (nnz : n ≠ 0) (pow_eq : m ^ k = r * n ^ k) {p : ℕ} (prime_p : p.Prime) :
k ∣ r.factorization p :=
2 In this example, the prime_p hypothesis is not used in the proof (as provided in the solutions)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
1 At the end of section 5.1 there is a mention to Nat.count_factors_mul_of_pos which I can't #check, and is not used at all in the following (supposedly related) example:
example {m n k r : ℕ} (nnz : n ≠ 0) (pow_eq : m ^ k = r * n ^ k) {p : ℕ} (prime_p : p.Prime) :
k ∣ r.factorization p :=
2 In this example, the prime_p hypothesis is not used in the proof (as provided in the solutions)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: