Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syncing node reports its syncing state as Idle. #1003

Closed
i1i1 opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1024
Closed

Syncing node reports its syncing state as Idle. #1003

i1i1 opened this issue Dec 8, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1024
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working consensus Something that impacts consensus core Related to core protocol, may affect fundamentals node Node (service library/node app)
Milestone

Comments

@i1i1
Copy link
Contributor

i1i1 commented Dec 8, 2022

The sdk tried to block on syncing of the node, but it sometimes reports false positives. I debugged issue a bit and it seems that:

  1. node sometimes receives block announcement from each synced peers which reports themselves as not sync
  2. so it sets everyone as not sync
  3. in the end it assumes noone is sync for a moment
  4. in some time it receives new block announcements and everything is now back to normal
@i1i1 i1i1 added bug Something isn't working node Node (service library/node app) labels Dec 8, 2022
@nazar-pc nazar-pc self-assigned this Dec 8, 2022
@nazar-pc nazar-pc added this to the Gemini 3a milestone Dec 8, 2022
@nazar-pc nazar-pc added core Related to core protocol, may affect fundamentals consensus Something that impacts consensus labels Dec 8, 2022
@nazar-pc nazar-pc mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2022
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working consensus Something that impacts consensus core Related to core protocol, may affect fundamentals node Node (service library/node app)
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants