Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: address search bar issue in the navbar #3447

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

allenhack638
Copy link
Contributor

@allenhack638 allenhack638 commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

This PR fixes the issue where the SearchBar was not showing on the navbar. It ensures the search bar is correctly rendered and behaves as expected.

Screenshot 2024-12-04 223936

Fixes

Fixes #3371 : [BUG] SearchBar is not showing on the navbar

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the SearchButton component to support dynamic rendering of its content based on the action key.
    • Improved handling of the children prop, allowing for both functional and static content display.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the SearchButton component within the AlgoliaSearch.tsx file. The primary modification is the introduction of a conditional check for the children prop, allowing it to accept either a function or static content. If children is a function, it invokes the function with an actionKey to dynamically set the button's content. The useEffect hook is updated to reflect this new logic, while the overall functionality of the Algolia search remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx Enhanced SearchButton to support dynamic rendering of children prop based on whether it's a function or static content. Updated useEffect to accommodate new logic. No changes to other components.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
SearchButton should render children correctly (#3441)

Poem

🐰 In the search bar's glow,
A button now can show,
Whether static or a function,
It dances with intention!
Click and see it shine,
Dynamic and divine! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2b190c3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/675bab0b2dffa90008b40223
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3447--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.22%. Comparing base (172f4d6) to head (2b190c3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3447   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.22%   77.22%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines         663      663           
=======================================
  Hits          512      512           
  Misses        151      151           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Dec 4, 2024

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 40
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3447--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx (1)

315-316: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability

To prevent similar issues in the future and improve component reliability:

  1. Consider adding proper TypeScript types for the function children
  2. Add error boundaries to catch render failures
  3. Add documentation about the expected children format

Here's a suggested improvement for the types:

type SearchButtonChildren = React.ReactNode | (({ actionKey }: { actionKey: { shortKey: string; key: string } }) => React.ReactNode);

interface ISearchButtonProps extends Omit<React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>, 'children'> {
  children?: SearchButtonChildren;
  indexName?: string;
}

And add JSDoc documentation:

/**
 * SearchButton component that renders a button to trigger the search modal.
 * @param props - The component props
 * @param props.children - Can be either a ReactNode or a function that receives actionKey and returns ReactNode
 * @param props.indexName - Optional index name for Algolia search
 * @example
 * // Using with static children
 * <SearchButton>
 *   <IconLoupe />
 * </SearchButton>
 * 
 * // Using with function children
 * <SearchButton>
 *   {({ actionKey }) => (
 *     <>
 *       <IconLoupe />
 *       <span>Search ({actionKey.shortKey}+K)</span>
 *     </>
 *   )}
 * </SearchButton>
 */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72c8dd8 and 23b9694.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx (1)
Learnt from: amanbhoria
PR: asyncapi/website#3373
File: components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx:313-313
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T06:59:33.852Z
Learning: In the `SearchButton` component within `components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx`, if the component re-renders on every button click and the `useEffect` runs accordingly, adding dependencies to the dependency array might not be necessary.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx (2)

315-316: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix useEffect implementation to handle children updates properly

The current implementation has several issues that could explain why the IconLoupe wasn't rendering:

  1. The useEffect hook runs only once due to empty dependencies array, so it won't update when children prop changes
  2. Missing dependencies could cause stale closures
  3. No type checking before function call could cause runtime errors

Apply this fix to ensure proper rendering and updates:

  useEffect(() => {
    if (typeof children === 'function') {
      setChildren(children({ actionKey }));
    } else {
      setChildren(children);
    }
-  }, []);
+  }, [children, actionKey]);

Additionally, consider adding type safety:

  useEffect(() => {
-   if (typeof children === 'function') {
+   if (children && typeof children === 'function') {
      setChildren(children({ actionKey }));
    } else {
      setChildren(children);
    }
  }, [children, actionKey]);

Let's verify if this component is used with function children elsewhere:

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies in useEffect are necessary for proper functionality

The search results confirm that the SearchButton component is used with function children in Hero.tsx:

<SearchButton className='...'>
  {({ actionKey }) => (
    // ...
  )}
</SearchButton>

This validates that both dependencies (children and actionKey) are actively used in the codebase and must be included in the useEffect dependencies array to ensure proper updates when either prop changes.

The fix proposed in the original review is correct:

  useEffect(() => {
    if (typeof children === 'function') {
      setChildren(children({ actionKey }));
    } else {
      setChildren(children);
    }
-  }, []);
+  }, [children, actionKey]);
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for SearchButton usage with function children
ast-grep --pattern 'SearchButton $$$>
  {({ actionKey }) => $$$}
</SearchButton>'

Length of output: 83


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for SearchButton usage
rg -l "SearchButton" --type tsx --type jsx

# Then look for any function children pattern in those files
rg "SearchButton.*{.*=>.*}" -A 2 --type tsx --type jsx

Length of output: 247


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing SearchButton
rg -l "SearchButton"

# Then look for any function children pattern with proper escaping
rg "SearchButton.*\{.*=>" -A 2

Length of output: 257


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine how SearchButton is used in these files
for file in components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx components/navigation/NavBar.tsx components/navigation/DocsNavWrapper.tsx components/navigation/MobileNavMenu.tsx components/navigation/DocsMobileMenu.tsx components/Hero.tsx; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  rg "SearchButton" -B 1 -A 1 "$file"
done

Length of output: 6151


315-316: Verify the fix resolves the IconLoupe rendering issue

While the changes address the children handling, please verify:

  1. That IconLoupe renders correctly after these changes
  2. That the search functionality works as expected
  3. That keyboard shortcuts still work properly

Let's verify the IconLoupe component usage:

✅ Verification successful

IconLoupe implementation and search functionality are properly integrated

The verification shows that:

  1. IconLoupe is correctly implemented and used across multiple components
  2. The search functionality includes proper keyboard shortcuts (/, Cmd/Ctrl+K)
  3. The children state management in AlgoliaSearch is correctly handling the IconLoupe component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for IconLoupe imports and usage
rg "IconLoupe" --type tsx --type ts

# Search for other icon components that might be affected
rg "Icon.*" --type tsx --type ts

Length of output: 126


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for IconLoupe imports and usage without file type restrictions
rg "IconLoupe"

# Search for the AlgoliaSearch component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const AlgoliaSearch = $_'

# Check if there are any test files related to search functionality
fd -g "*search*.test.*"
fd -g "*Search*.test.*"

Length of output: 910


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Loupe icon implementation
cat components/icons/Loupe.tsx

# Check the AlgoliaSearch component for icon usage
cat components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx

# Look for any search-related keyboard shortcuts
rg "keyboard|keydown|keypress" components/AlgoliaSearch.tsx

Length of output: 10872

TRohit20
TRohit20 approved these changes Dec 4, 2024
@anshgoyalevil
Copy link
Member

/rtm

@anshgoyalevil
Copy link
Member

Thanks @allenhack638 for the PR 🎆

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit a9bc0b2 into asyncapi:master Dec 13, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] algolia search icon not visible on website navbar
4 participants