Support security field at Operation level

[smoya]

Reason/Context

Part of asyncapi/spec#584.

Description

Support security field containing an array of SecurityRequirement at Operation level.

As this is a good candidate to be in v2.3.0 release, the PR should be created from and targeting 2022-01-release branch.

As far as I see, the change we need to do is to add a new function called security into the operation model. I think we can copy the one from the server found in https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-js/blob/2022-01-release/lib/models/server.js#L65-L72

[sekharbans-ebay]

Reason/Context

Part of asyncapi/spec#584.

Description

Support security field containing an array of SecurityRequirement at Operation level.

As this is a good candidate to be in v2.3.0 release, the PR should be created from and targeting 2022-01-release branch.

As far as I see, the change we need to do is to add a new function called security into the operation model. I think we can copy the one from the server found in https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-js/blob/2022-01-release/lib/models/server.js#L65-L72

Ack. Is simply copying the function ok? Would you in addition like ServerSecurityRequirement (server-security-requirement.js) renamed to 'SecurityRequirement' and reused for both server and operation - or a OperationSecurityRequirement equivalent created?

[magicmatatjahu]

@sekharbans-ebay Hi!

Ack. Is simply copying the function ok? Would you in addition like ServerSecurityRequirement (server-security-requirement.js) renamed to 'SecurityRequirement' and reused for both server and operation - or a OperationSecurityRequirement equivalent created?

as I see server-security-requirement.js is empty class, so you can create equivalent the OperationSecurityRequirement class. If in the future something additional will appear in the ServerSecurityRequirement class, we will create a separate class that will be extended both in ServerSecurityRequirement and in OperationSecurityRequirement classes, don't worry :)

[sekharbans-ebay]

Thanks so much Lokesh!
Hi @smoya, @magicmatatjahu, @derberg - request review please

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[magicmatatjahu]

Handled by #505