Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Implement annotation processing #50

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 10, 2023
Merged

feat: Implement annotation processing #50

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 10, 2023

Conversation

lorenzsimon
Copy link
Member

What

Add technology agnostic annotations and processing for meta-configuration.

Why

  • better developer experience for documentation generation
  • better maintainability
  • automatic schema generation

How

  • add annotation model
  • add annotation processors for channels, messages and schemas

lorenz-scalable and others added 8 commits March 2, 2023 10:24
* feat - Implement message model annotations

* chore - Remove unused dependencies
* feat - Implement Message annotation processing

* feat - Merge annotation components

* feat - Add schema annotation processor

* refactor - Make annotation processor context dynamic
test - Add annotation provider integration test

* chore - ktlint format

* refactor - Refactor dependency management

---------

Co-authored-by: lorenzsimon <[email protected]>
* feat - Add Channel and Operation annotations

* feat - Add Channel processing

* refactor - Annotation keys to values

* chore - Fix confusing test values
* refactor - Annotation mapping improvements

* refactor - Add option for inline messages and schemas

* refactor - Use classname for channel component keys if autogenerated

* fix - Typo

* test - Fix Schemas test
feat - Add Kotlin module to model resolver
* refactor - Context providers

* feat - Bind channels to annotation components

* refactor - Annotation components binding
@lorenzsimon lorenzsimon merged commit e94848e into master Apr 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants