You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to integrate the output of asyncapi validate to Gitlab's merge request.
Gitlab supports following artefact types.
While both Gitlab and asyncapi supports Junit format, it's not the most suitable format for this task.
It would be preferable to use codeclimate.
Description
It would be nice add support of codeclimate to validate --diagnastics-format.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.
There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.
Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.
Reason/Context
I would like to integrate the output of asyncapi validate to Gitlab's merge request.
Gitlab supports following artefact types.
While both Gitlab and asyncapi supports Junit format, it's not the most suitable format for this task.
It would be preferable to use codeclimate.
Description
It would be nice add support of
codeclimate
tovalidate --diagnastics-format
.Code climate specification is available here:
Basic implementation should be easy and avoid users having to implement their own mapping steps.
For reference codeclimate support has been added to redocly-cli 18 months ago for this exact purpose.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: