Respect hash-equivalent literals in iteration-over-set
#14063
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
charliermarsh
force-pushed
the
charlie/hash-eq
branch
2 times, most recently
from
44402e2
to
b37c449
Compare
|
Welcome back, |
|
New |
|
Ah wait this doesn't work for tuples. |
|
charliermarsh
force-pushed
the
charlie/hash-eq
branch
from
b37c449
to
b9206cd
Compare
charliermarsh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2024
## Summary Like #14063, but ensures that we catch cases like `{1, True}` in which the items hash to the same value despite not being identical.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #14049.