Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Python 3.13 to list of allowed Python versions #11411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

charliermarsh
Copy link
Member

Summary

I believe we're already "Python 3.13-ready"? The main Ruff-impacting change I see in https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html is PEP 696 which Jelle added in #11120.

Base automatically changed from charlie/std to main May 13, 2024 16:27
@charliermarsh charliermarsh enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2024 16:29
@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 6ed2482 into main May 13, 2024
38 checks passed
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the charlie/py313 branch May 13, 2024 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Formatter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

Formatter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no format changes.

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

I guess one other thing we could do is update UP035 to emit a diagnostic if --target-version=py313 has been selected and a user imports typing.TypeIs, warnings.deprecated, typing.ReadOnly, typing.NoDefault typing.get_protocol_members or typing.is_protocol from typing_extensions rather than typing

@charliermarsh
Copy link
Member Author

Makes sense, mind filing an issue (or PRing it)? :)

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

Makes sense, mind filing an issue (or PRing it)? :)

#11413

starsep added a commit to starsep/ruff that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants