New Rule + fixer: Use a list instead of calling split with string literals

[Avasam]

I've seen this pattern a handful of time:

"""
	itemA
	itemB
	itemC
""".split()

or

"a,b,c,d".split(",")

And I'd like a rule to transform usages of join with literals into actual inline lists without the overhead of calling "join". My two examples above would become:

[
	"itemA",
	"itemB",
	"itemC",
]

or

["a", "b", "c", "d"]

I don't think this rule exists in any linters that I'm aware of.

The exact details of how this gets formatted isn't important to this rule. Probably just rewrite everything on a single line and let formatting/other rules take care of the rest.

[sbrugman]

Great suggestion, I think it's worth adding. With autofix this adds to developer experience as writing the comma-seperated pattern is sometimes just more convenient.

Real-world examples:

• https://github.com/apache/fury/blob/main/java/benchmark/analyze.py#L246
• https://github.com/alibaba/AliceMind/blob/main/VECO/NLU/evaluate.py#L103
• https://github.com/microsoft/DirectXShaderCompiler/blob/main/utils/hct/hctdb.py#L261
• https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/blob/main/pandas/tests/reshape/merge/test_merge_asof.py#L61
• https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/main/numpy/f2py/tests/test_return_real.py#L91

Similar rule: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/static-join-to-f-string/

[MichaReiser]

This seems reasonable. Although I'm somewhat surprised that people do this :D

The comma pattern seems easy enough to detect. The split without a separator needs some extra care to ensure we apply the exact same logic.

[sbrugman]

For posterity, @AlexWaygood noticed that this rule exists in flake8-simplify:
MartinThoma/flake8-simplify#86 (SIM905)