Is it possible for ruff to preserve the multi-line list comprehension for readability?

[jd-solanki]

Hi 👋🏻

Big fan of Ruff & Sister projects ❤️

Can we preserve the multi-line list comprehension for readability?

    return [
        data
        for data in sku_data
        if data.date >= today.replace(month=today.month - duration_in_months)
    ]

With ruff it's get formatted in single line:

return [data for data in sku_data if data.date >= today.replace(month=today.month - duration_in_months)]

My ruff config:

# Docs: https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/settings/
select = ["ALL"]
fix = true
target-version = "py312"
line-length = 120

ignore = [
    "D101",   # Missing docstring in public class
    "D104",   # Missing docstring in public package
    "D100",   # Missing docstring in public module
    "ANN201", # Missing return type annotation for public function `get_db`
    "D103",   # Missing docstring in public function
    "INP001", # File `X` is part of an implicit namespace package. Add an `__init__.py`.
    "D102",   # Missing docstring in public method
    "D107",   # Missing docstring in `__init__`
    "ANN101", # Missing type annotation for `self` in method
    "D106",   # Missing docstring in public nested class
    "ERA001", # Found commented-out code
    "T201",   # `print` found

    # Comments
    "TD002", # Missing author in TODO; try: `# TODO(<author_name>): ...` or `# TODO @<author_name>: ...`
    "TD003", # Missing issue link on the line following this TODO

    # FastAPI only
    "B008", # Do not perform function call `Depends` in argument defaults
]
[extend-per-file-ignores]
"tests/**" = ["S101", "PLR2004"]

[format]
skip-magic-trailing-comma = false

[MichaReiser]

Thanks for the kind words and reporting the improvement.

This has come up before. I'll merge the issue into #11753